ronnie_magee@...: |
I too, like Mario, have experienced the same "grayed out Transitions button." However, unlike Mario, I am not as amicable about the lame Video ReMaker 4.0. It is inexcusable to deliver such a shoddy piece of half finished software into the market.
I have struggled with the issue of joining my home videos to produce a semi professional home movie using AVS software. I do not ask for much, just the ability to join some MPEGs together with fade in, fade out and a simple fade transition between scenes, while keeping the original quality of my video. Unfortunately after months of trying AVS's various solutions I am at a standstill. |
Hi all.
I totally agree with Ronnie about transitions, and much more about Video ReMaker. Today's version, 4.4.2.168, released few days ago, is not different from others; perhaps worse.
I have struggled with the issue of joining my home videos....
Yesterday I had the last huge disappointment. I downloaded and installed once again last version of ReMaker, but the result has been the same of last months. Since last october I am fighting with AVS Support about ReMaker joins of my M2TS clips.
(To support manager: please give a look on my support page -enribest@yahoo.it- Kate/Dariela).
ReMaker is easy to use, wonderful to analyse videos frame to frame, wonderful to join a lot of clips together to make a movie - more than 350 at a time, 21+ GB -, but only if they are
untouched, joins are raw, but clean; wonderful to save M2TS clips or movies as source, with same splendid quality. But don't try to trim any frame, or any part of scene, as promised everywhere: almost all joins are shaky, jerky, due to overlapping of some frames, sometimes of a whole gop.
The possibility to put between these joins a quick transition, is not the solution, but would make that, less horrible.
ronnie_magee@...: |
I can categorically state that Video Editor is a sophisticated editing tool with onegaping hole in it. When it re-renders videos, (which it must do,) it does so with horrendous loss of quality |
I agree with Ronnie.
Support suggested me to use Editor. IMHO Video Editor is a great editing tool, with a lot of useful features.
But, why must I lose the most important thing, the wonderful HD video quality??? It outputs videos in a bunch of formats, some even useless: WHY shall it not be able to save a file simply AS IT IS, how it can easily do the more modest ReMaker?? Is it so difficult for developers to apply, in many months time, these feature to a tool, that could be like or better than others that cost hundreds of dollars/pounds?
Please don't mind my bad english.
Waiting for an answere. Best regards.
Enrico